Skip to content Skip to navigation

Lemann Center Webinars

Interview with Joinville Secretary of Education Diego Calegari

Diego Calegari is the secretary of education of Joinville, the most populous city in the state of Santa Catarina. Before becoming secretary, he founded Politize!, one of the largest non-governmental organizations for political education in Brazil. Upon his visit to the Lemann Center in November 2024, Calegari was interviewed about his experience with political education in Brazil.

Lemann Center: Tell us how and why you founded Politize! What brought you to the topic of political education?

Calegari: I had the idea of founding Politize! after the 2013 protests in Brazil, when there was an exponential growth in interest in politics among youths. I knew that this interest coupled with preparation would lead to more effective, qualified political participation, so I decided to create a large-scale political education initiative, which did not exist in Brazil back then. In fact, Brazil and many other democratic countries still lack proper political education. So I founded Politize! to positively impact democracy in Brazil.

Lemann Center: How do you believe that political education may influence citizen behavior and encourage pro-democratic practices and values?

Calegari: I have witnessed many people whose viewpoints and behavior were transformed by education. Political education is important for the construction of a genuinely democratic society. That is why the countries that have most successfully resisted authoritarianism have very strong programs for pro-democratic education, preparing their citizens to exert citizenship. But there are challenges, including anti-democratic forces that incentivize radicalism and the support for authoritarian values. This is a challenge that I did not face when I first started Politize! but that is present now.

Lemann Center: When you picture a politically active citizen, what values and practices do they have/enact? And what is the impact on Brazilian democracy of a pro-democratic culture?

Calegari: A first key value is respect—for others and for democracy—and appreciation of plurality. A second component is knowledge and access to political information, especially now that disinformation is a rampant issue. A third value is participation in community, thinking about the common good. Not everyone will be an activist or a member of an association, but even doing small actions is important, such as obeying the law or contributing to a local cause when possible.

Creating citizens with these values strengthens democracy as a political system. Then, as democracy becomes stronger, it manages to provide for its citizens better, which in turn makes citizens more willing to participate in politics. So it is a self-perpetuating cycle.

Lemann Center: What were your main takeaways from your time working with political education?

Calegari: When I first started my journey in political education, I thought that simply providing information to people would be enough to get them to make better political decisions. However, one thing that I noticed is that a lot of what we are politically is based on our experiences—from our primary and secondary socialization—and emotions, not strictly from ‘rational thinking’ as the Enlightenment suggested. Thus, in order to strengthen a pro-democratic culture, it is not enough to make a list of reasons why democracy is a good political system. Instead, it is necessary to imbue people with an appreciation for liberty, solidarity, and participation in community.

Political leaders have always played with emotions, but technology has changed how that happens, since social media and algorithms can be used to heighten certain emotions for the sake of engagement. So a question is how to preserve democracy and the primacy of facts over fictional narratives in the era of technology.

Lemann Center: Does your interest in political education inform your work as a secretary of education in any way? If so, how?

Calegari: Yes, it does, because education is not only academic; it involves the whole development of students as human beings, including physical, cognitive, social-affective, and ethical matters. Education for citizenship and democracy is part of this whole development starting in early childhood. For example, a child who learns to live with their classmates—to respect them, to share, to talk with them—already starts to develop important civic skills. The opposite is also true: if a child learns to use violence, they will reproduce that in the future.

I try to apply this in my work as secretary. First, I think of learning as going beyond cognitive skills and the knowledge of facts. Learning incorporates knowing how to be, how to live with others, how to develop relationships, all of which leads to democratic citizenship. But there are also curricular components that can address education for democratic values directly, such as history and geography.

Professor Guilherme Lichand's work on Equidade.info is featured by the Stanford GSE

Professor Guilherme Lichand's work on Equidade.info was recently featured by the Stanford Graduate School of Education. Equidade.info is an initiative that reveals racial, gender, and other disparities in Brazilian schools. Click here for the GSE news article!

Professor Guilherme Lichand is interviewed by Globo News

Year: 2024

Professor Guilherme Lichand recently shared his expertise on a pressing educational issue during an interview with Globo News. He discussed the challenges many educational institutions face in maintaining attendance and engagement in the classroom in the context of climate emergencies, shedding light on the findings revealed by a recent study conducted by Equidade.info.

See the interview below!

Video Link: 

Click here to watch the interview

Professor Guilherme Lichand is interviewed by TV Cultura

Professor Guilherme Lichand recently shared his expertise on a pressing educational issue during an interview with TV Cultura. He discussed the challenges many educational institutions face in maintaining attendance and engagement in the classroom, shedding light on the findings revealed by a recent study conducted by Equidade.info.

Did you know that four out of every ten Brazilian children missed school for at least three consecutive days in 2023? Professor Lichand delved into the implications of this alarming statistic, addressing both public and private schools' struggles in this regard. As part of our commitment to understanding and improving educational outcomes, Professor Lichand's insights provide valuable perspectives on the state of education in Brazil.

See the interview below!

Work, Create, and Play for Good in Extended Reality

Martin Carnoy and Eric Bettinger named to the 2024 RHSU Edu-Scholar Public Influence Rankings

Congratulations to Martin Carnoy and Eric Bettinger who are named to the 2024 RHSU Edu-Scholar Public Influence Rankings, , recognizing the 200 university-based scholars who had the biggest influence on educational practice and policy last year.

For the full list and to learn more about the rankings, visit The 2024 RHSU Edu-Scholar Public Influence Rankings.

 

Interview of Claudio Sassaki

Segregation within schools

Antonio Gois

The level of segregation in Brazilian schools is similar to that seen in the USA, a country where various intentional practices in dividing students into classes lead to high levels of separation between whites and blacks. This situation is verified when, within the same school, there are predominantly white classes alongside others that are mostly black. In Brazil, however, even though the mechanisms of separation between students are not explicit, we still end up reproducing a pattern of high racial inequality within schools. These are the findings of a study by sociologist Josh Leung-Gagné, from Stanford University, which has just been published in one of the academic journals of the Association of Educational Researchers in the United States (Aera, for its acronym in English).

To arrive at these conclusions, Leung-Gagné compared the distribution by color or race of students in the 5th and 9th grades of Brazilian elementary education with the patterns observed in high schools in North Carolina, a state with high levels of segregation. Although the final results are similar, the study identifies that the mechanisms that lead to this situation are different.

In North Carolina, as in other American states, one of the factors that induce racial segregation is “tracking”, which basically consists of separating classes based on the academic performance of students. What could be considered simply a criterion of merit turns out to be, for several reasons, a way of perpetuating inequalities, since the socioeconomic level of families is the main impact factor on school performance. As black students come, on average, from poorer families, they already carry a disadvantage that has nothing to do with their effort.

In addition, there are also studies in the USA that show that the criteria used by professors to direct students to the most advanced classes are not totally neutral, making black students, even with equal performance in standardized tests as their white colleagues, less likely to be identified as able to be part of the most advanced classes.

What is intriguing about the findings of the Leung-Gagné study is that these practices are rare in Brazil. Here, racial segregation occurs, in the words of the author, “at random”. Even so, the research identified classrooms in the same school where in one class the proportion of blacks reached 70%, while in another it did not exceed 30%.

The finding that segregation in the division by classes within the school occurs here “by chance” does not mean that they should be naturalized. Since this is an easily observable data from the beginning of the school year, Leung-Gagné argues that it is up to schools to take proactive action to prevent this from happening early on.

The finding of high levels of segregation within Brazilian schools reinforces the need to expand our knowledge about practices that, even implicit, are contributing to this situation. We know that racial segregation is reinforced by differentiated access to schools. However, a relevant part of our inequality is also built inside schools and classrooms. Without identifying and seeking solutions to this problem, we will continue to reproduce inequalities within the educational system.

published by O Globo (*)

Congratulations to our Masters Students! Class of 2023

POLICY REVIEW: Medindo competência de leitura

O Brasil está finalmente definindo o que significa ser alfabetizado ao final do 2º ano do Ensino Fundamental. Se a Base Nacional Curricular Comum (BNCC) define o conjunto de habilidades e competências que uma criança deve aprender a cada série, não explicita quais uma criança deveria dominar para ser considerada proficiente. De fato, isso não é tarefa simples: envolve definir padrões mínimos para diferentes habilidades – como o número de palavras lidas corretamente por minuto, uma medida de fluência leitora, ou os tipos de texto que um aluno deveria ser capaz de ler ou escrever. Como exemplo, Portugal define a fluência adequada nessa faixa etária como de ao menos 75 palavras por minuto. No Brasil, o Ministério da Educação (MEC) recém anunciou que, ao final do 2º ano, ser alfabetizado deveria corresponder a “escrever bilhetes e convites e ler textos simples, tirinhas e histórias em quadrinhos” – correspondente a uma pontuação de ao menos 743 pontos na avaliação do Sistema Nacional da Avaliação Básica (Saeb).

Download brief

Pages